texture rendering without filtering 2004-06-03 - By Andras Ikladi
Back
kim aldis wrote:
> That I couln't be sure about without running some tests. It's not something
>I do a lot of, although I was working with someone a year or so ago who was
>doing camera projections for set replacement and he had a hell of a job
>trying to get it right. My guess is that there'd need to be some kind of
>filtering because the textured image could get pulled around in all sorts of
>ways, stretched or compressed according to camera, object distortion,
>scaling, whatever. The question really is, does it filter where it doesn't
>really need to.
>
>The comment was no more, really, than an observation in the interests of
>completeness. I have a thing about accuracy and it seemed to me that it was
>possible to infer that threshold played a part when in fact it didn't.
>
>
Sorry, i was more replying to Bernard's post, just was a lazy beotch
including the correct history :)
---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo@(protected) with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi
|
|
