Lip Sync 2004-04-29 - By Matt Morris
Back
As much as that might simplify things, you really need the extra control
that having a seperate bone for the jaw gives. Its all about subtlety at the
end of the day. It greatly increases the range of expression.
The blend shapes also become really obvious in the animation without it, as
the animation of the points is linear between them, but with the jawbone it
moves in arcs which is more natural.
-- --Original Message-- --
From: owner-xsi@(protected) [mailto:owner-xsi@(protected)]On Behalf
Of Jeff Sargeant
Sent: 29 April 2004 20:17
To: XSI@(protected)
Subject: Lip Sync
In the 4.0 lipsync tutorial posted on the website, lipsync animation is
achieved with a combination of shape animation for the lips and
a bone that creates the jaw movement. My question is why would you
ever do that?
Why wouldn't you just model each phoneme shape with the jaw rotated to
the
correct position in the first place, instead of relying on a bone to do
that later during the animation
process? It seems like this approach is creating more work down the
road, but I could be
missing something, it's happened before.
---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo@(protected) with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi
---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo@(protected) with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi
|
|
