Mailing List
Home
Forum Home
Softimage
Carrara
trueSpace
Dir3d-l
Maya - a powerful 3D animation and visual effects software
Macromedia Flash Development
Subjects
Cameras
scaleDown command
black out solved
Aircraft Tutorial
Mathematical XYZ ?
Its done This vs That
Its done first week
recommendations for screen video captures?
3DExplorer "Oddity "
New Director
ProTeam renewals
Fuel 's new websites (X post)
Blue peter create a make toy
targeting groups question
XPost: Shockwave 3D game ( sort of )
RES: RES: RES: Fish Modeling
Emitting particles from object intersection
Fuel 's new websites (X post)
Texturing
Big Break Contest Videos
New Plugins
Models and Texture on my updated site
Error Installing Patch tS6 6
Plasma?
Looking for Inspiration
Weird EMail Q
It 's done first week ?
Cherry not cranberry
New game
Camera Animation Problem
Particle plugins?
 
Bezier curves in 4.0 ??

Bezier curves in 4.0 ??

2004-04-28       - By kim aldis

 Back
Reply:     <<     11     12     13     14     15     16     17     18     19     20     >>  

Handles. (I was being ironic)

I've said it all before. If you want Beziers, fine, but the point here is
that if NURBS were fully implemented then you'd have NURBS with handles. If
you were given Beziers, before long you'd be bitching that you couldn't trim
your Beziers. NURBS done properly you can have both, and more. Then of
course, there's the issue of the amount of work required to make Beziers
work in Xsi. You don't just want Beziers, you want Beziers that work with
everything else; lofting, extruding, path constraints,  merging ..........
Think of the amount of work involved there and how it impacts on future
features.

No, you really don't want Beziers.

You don't have them in 4.0 either.

> -- --Original Message-- --
> From: owner-xsi@(protected)
> [mailto:owner-xsi@(protected)] On Behalf Of Stefan Andersson
> Sent: 28 April 2004 15:46
> To: XSI@(protected)
> Subject: Re: Bezier curves in 4.0 ??
>
> handels
>
>
>
> kim aldis wrote:
> > What is the point?
> >
> >
> >>-- --Original Message-- --
> >>From: owner-xsi@(protected)
> >>[mailto:owner-xsi@(protected)] On Behalf Of Adam Seeley
> >>Sent: 28 April 2004 14:58
> >>To: 'XSI@(protected)'
> >>Subject: RE: Bezier curves in 4.0 ??
> >>
> >>Kim,
> >>
> >>I knooowww bezier are a subset of nurbs. S'not the point.....
> >>
> >>A.
> >>
> >>:/
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>-- --Original Message-- --
> >>>From: kim aldis [mailto:kim@(protected)]
> >>>Sent: 28 April 2004 14:45
> >>>To: XSI@(protected)
> >>>Subject: RE: Bezier curves in 4.0 ??
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>I'll just go into the corner and quietly scream to myself. ;)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>-- --Original Message-- --
> >>>>From: owner-xsi@(protected)
> >>>>[mailto:owner-xsi@(protected)] On Behalf Of Adam Seeley
> >>>>Sent: 28 April 2004 12:53
> >>>>To: 'XSI@(protected)'
> >>>>Subject: Bezier curves in 4.0 ??
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>So, Bezier curves in 4.0 ??
> >>>>
> >>>>Can't help being curious whilst I'm faffing around with
> >>>
> >>the current
> >>
> >>>>nurbs setup.
> >>>>
> >>>>Anyone?
> >>>>
> >>>>A.
> >>>
> >>__ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ __
> __ ____ __
> >>This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email
> Security System.
> >>For more information please visit
> >>http://www.messagelabs.com/email
> >>__ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ __
> __ ____ __
> >>---
> >>Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo@(protected) with the
> following text in
> >>body:
> >>unsubscribe xsi
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---
> > Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo@(protected) with the
> following text in body:
> > unsubscribe xsi
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Stefan Andersson
> Freelancing Pixel Abuser
>
>
> ---
> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo@(protected) with the following
> text in body:
> unsubscribe xsi
>
>
>



---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo@(protected) with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi