Mailing List
Home
Forum Home
Softimage
Carrara
trueSpace
Dir3d-l
Maya - a powerful 3D animation and visual effects software
Macromedia Flash Development
Subjects
Subject: Cameras
Subject: scaleDown command
Subject: black out solved
Subject: Aircraft Tutorial
Subject: Mathematical XYZ ?
Subject: Re: Its done This vs That
Subject: Re: Its done first week
recommendations for screen video captures?
Subject: 3DExplorer "Oddity "
Subject: Re: New Director
Subject: ProTeam renewals
Fuel 's new websites (X post)
Blue peter create a make toy
targeting groups question
XPost: Shockwave 3D game ( sort of )
Subject: RES: RES: RES: Fish Modeling
Emitting particles from object intersection
Fuel 's new websites (X post)
Subject: Re: Texturing
Big Break Contest Videos
Subject: New Plugins
Models and Texture on my updated site
Error Installing Patch tS6 6
Subject: Plasma?
Looking for Inspiration
Subject: Weird EMail Q
Subject: Re: It 's done first week ?
Subject: Cherry not cranberry
Subject: Re: New game
Camera Animation Problem
Subject: Particle plugins?
 
Kicking the programming in TrueSpace can around

Kicking the programming in TrueSpace can around

2005-06-02       - By Lars Nilsson

 Back
Reply:     1     2     3     4     5     6     7     8     9     10  

On 6/2/05, David Stubbs <hawksridge@(protected)> wrote:
> Although - Win 2000 and the like is .net capable - to what degree I do not
> know when compared with XP ?

Quoted from the download page[1] for the .NET framework redistributable package:

[snip]
System Requirements
Supported Operating Systems: Windows 2000, Windows 98, Windows ME,
Windows NT, Windows XP

Microsoft Windows NT 4.0 requires Service Pack 6a.
[snip]

"Supported operating system" means .NET programs will work as expected
on these operating systems. Notice how ME, despite being a total
abomination, is supported. None is considered better as far as
supporting .NET is concerned. Normal hardware drivers (not .NET
related) would IMHO play a greater role in running a .NET program on a
particular OS (particularly thinking of graphics drivers).

Having clarified what operating systems are capable of running .NET
programs (using Microsoft's .NET framework, see below for
alternatives), it should also be said that the .NET framework is
pretty much Microsoft's answer to a Java VM and its associated
libraries. An interpreter (a just-in-time compiler and related
technologies are involved) runs your .NET programs, just like a JVM
(from Sun or others) interpret/just-in-time-compiles Java class files.

Final words, .NET does not replace any particular operating system, or
make it impossible to use on the common platforms available. Also,
since Microsoft went through the trouble of standardizing .NET to a
certain extent, it has presumably also made life easier for those that
reverse-engineer/follow-the-spec when implementing a new
.NET-compatible framework (like Mono[2] and DotGNU[3]). The
open-source varieties of .NET have no problem whatsoever (not counting
bugs and unimplemented functionality) running .NET programs compiled
with Microsoft tools. They also function quite well on the various
open-source operating systems, and MacOS X, etc.

Lars Nilsson

[1] http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID&2D25E3-F589-4842
-8157-034D1E7CF3A3&displaylang=en
[2] http://www.mono-project.com/Main_Page
[3] http://www.dotgnu.org/

__ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ______
****************************************************************************
********
This message has been checked for all known viruses by the Cable & Wireless
E-mail Virus Protection service, powered by MessageLabs.

To purchase this service, please contact your Cable & Wireless Account
Manager.
****************************************************************************
********