 | | | Kicking the programming in TrueSpace can around | Kicking the programming in TrueSpace can around 2005-06-02 - By DAVID STUBBS
Back
Part 2
Hello again K
K wrote: So then, what your saying is that tS7 is slaved to XP specifically,
solely, and *exclusively* =>:-p ?
XP is a turning point in technology for Microsoft windows. It finally got it
to work and respond to user demands for the most part in correct form.
I know of a few University network supervisors who say it purrs like a kitten
to get the course dreams to the students without problems. So , it functions
well.
This means that the developers at Truespace can rely upon it as a core
for building upon it. Which is great.
Maybe , TrueSpace will have built into it a read out of the OS and components
like the plug and play of the OS whereupon it will temper the workspace to
the capabilities of it. How about that ?
TrueSpace 6.6 probably won't run on Win3.1 or OS2 Warp?
Although - Win 2000 and the like is .net capable - to what degree I do not know
when compared with XP ?
Still, programming applications is an evolving technology as is hardware and
others have to adapt to it as well so TrueSpace must be there too - Glad they
can do it.
I hope I get my question answered on the OS and App interaction methods.
David
KMKrieger <pterochromics@(protected)> wrote:
At 11:28 PM 31-05-05, DAVID STUBBS wrote:
>This topic has programming TrueSpace focus.
>
>The Win 32 system in XP is a significant factor in terms of processing
>speed and ram memory with 32 bit programming and a .net programming language.
Are those of W2KPro the same? IOW are we slaved to XP or does W2KPro offer
annlaternative?
I've used XP and it drove me to re-word the old joke. To whit:
Q.: "How many icons-clicks does it take for XP to open a 2-line *.TXT file?"
A.: "100 - 99 to wind through the Gorgon-like User INterface and one to
actually open the file."
>To understand the significance of the different programming languages
>provides a rationale of system requirements when writing code for XP and
>TrueSpace.
So then, what your saying is that tS7 is slaved to XP specifically, solely,
and *exclusively* =>:-p ?
I can't comment on the rest because it is gobbldyguk to me.
- K.
>Also, in terms of just what the Win 32 system is doing within each
>programming technique applied to coding and runtime code results. in
>terms of a system demands. or for that matter a .Net 32 bit OS .
>
>Here are a few scenerios I can think of:
>
>Low memory demands if 32 bit and procedural code such as c or c++
>functions are the main messaging.
>
>higher memory demands
>32 bit and class coding in 32 bit such as c++ , vb etc.
>class instances carry overhead when instantiated to use a function in the OS.
>
>
>still higher memory demands
>A .Net XP and a .Net programming language.
>
>
>Thanks.
>
>
>David
>
>
>__ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ______
>****************************************************************************
>********
>This message has been checked for all known viruses by the Cable & Wireless
>E-mail Virus Protection service, powered by MessageLabs.
>
>To purchase this service, please contact your Cable & Wireless Account
>Manager.
>****************************************************************************
>********
__ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ______
****************************************************************************
********
This message has been checked for all known viruses by the Cable & Wireless
E-mail Virus Protection service, powered by MessageLabs.
To purchase this service, please contact your Cable & Wireless Account
Manager.
****************************************************************************
********
__ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ______
****************************************************************************
********
This message has been checked for all known viruses by the Cable & Wireless
E-mail Virus Protection service, powered by MessageLabs.
To purchase this service, please contact your Cable & Wireless Account
Manager.
****************************************************************************
********
<DIV>Part 2</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Hello again K</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>K wrote: So then, what your saying is that tS7 is slaved to XP
specifically, <BR>solely, and *exclusively* =>:-p ?<BR></DIV>
<DIV>XP is a turning point in technology for Microsoft windows. It finally got
it </DIV>
<DIV>to work and respond to user demands for the most part in correct form.<
/DIV>
<DIV>I know of a few University network supervisors who say it purrs like a
kitten </DIV>
<DIV>to get the course dreams to the students without problems. So , it
functions</DIV>
<DIV>well.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>This means that the developers at Truespace can rely upon it as a core<
/DIV>
<DIV>for building upon it. Which is great.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Maybe , TrueSpace will have built into it a read out of the OS and
components</DIV>
<DIV>like the plug and play of the OS whereupon it will temper the workspace to
</DIV>
<DIV>the capabilities of it. How about that ? </DIV>
<DIV><BR>TrueSpace 6.6 probably won't run on Win3.1 or OS2 Warp?</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Although - Win 2000 and the like is .net capable - to what degree I do not
know when compared with XP ?</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Still, programming applications is an evolving technology as is
hardware and others have to adapt to it as well so TrueSpace must be there too
- Glad they can do it.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I hope I get my question answered on the OS and App interaction methods.<
/DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>David</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><BR><B><I>KMKrieger <pterochromics@(protected)></I></B> wrote:<
/DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER
-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">At 11:28 PM 31-05-05, DAVID STUBBS wrote:<BR>>This
topic has programming TrueSpace focus.<BR>><BR>>The Win 32 system in XP
is a significant factor in terms of processing<BR>>speed and ram memory with
32 bit programming and a .net programming language.<BR><BR>Are those of W2KPro
the same? IOW are we slaved to XP or does W2KPro offer<BR>annlaternative?<BR>
<BR>I've used XP and it drove me to re-word the old joke. To whit:<BR><BR>Q.:
"How many icons-clicks does it take for XP to open a 2-line *.TXT file?"<BR>A.:
"100 - 99 to wind through the Gorgon-like User INterface and one to<BR>actually
open the file."<BR><BR>>To understand the significance of the different
programming languages<BR>>provides a rationale of system requirements when
writing code for XP and<BR>>TrueSpace.<BR><BR>So then, what your saying is
that tS7 is slaved to XP specifically, solely,<BR>and
*exclusively* =>:-p ?<BR><BR>I can't comment on the rest because it is
gobbldyguk to me.<BR><BR>- K.<BR><BR>>Also, in terms of just what the Win 32
system is doing within each<BR>>programming technique applied to coding and
runtime code results. in<BR>>terms of a system demands. or for that matter a
.Net 32 bit OS .<BR>><BR>>Here are a few scenerios I can think of:<BR>>
;<BR>>Low memory demands if 32 bit and procedural code such as c or c++<BR>
>functions are the main messaging.<BR>><BR>>higher memory demands<BR>
>32 bit and class coding in 32 bit such as c++ , vb etc.<BR>>class
instances carry overhead when instantiated to use a function in the OS.<BR>>
<BR>><BR>>still higher memory demands<BR>>A .Net XP and a .Net
programming
language.<BR>><BR>><BR>>Thanks.<BR>><BR>><BR>>David<BR>>
<BR>><BR>>__ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ______
__ __<BR>>*******************************************************************
*********<BR>>********<BR>>This message has been checked for all known
viruses by the Cable & Wireless<BR>>E-mail Virus Protection service,
powered by MessageLabs.<BR>><BR>>To purchase this service, please contact
your Cable & Wireless Account<BR>>Manager.<BR>>**********************
******************************************************<BR>>********<BR><BR>
<BR>__ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ______<BR>***
*************************************************************************<BR>***
*****<BR>This message has been checked for all known viruses by the Cable &
Wireless<BR>E-mail Virus Protection service, powered by MessageLabs.<BR><BR>To
purchase this service, please contact your Cable
& Wireless Account<BR>Manager.<BR>****************************************
************************************<BR>********<BR></BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR>
__ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ______<BR>
****************************************************************************<BR>
********<BR>
This message has been checked for all known viruses by the Cable & Wireless<BR>
E-mail Virus Protection service, powered by MessageLabs.<BR>
<BR>
To purchase this service, please contact your Cable & Wireless Account<BR>
Manager.<BR>
****************************************************************************<BR>
********<BR>
|
|
|