Mailing List
Home
Forum Home
Softimage
Carrara
trueSpace
Dir3d-l
Maya - a powerful 3D animation and visual effects software
Macromedia Flash Development
Subjects
Subject: Cameras
Subject: scaleDown command
Subject: black out solved
Subject: Aircraft Tutorial
Subject: Mathematical XYZ ?
Subject: Re: Its done This vs That
Subject: Re: Its done first week
recommendations for screen video captures?
Subject: 3DExplorer "Oddity "
Subject: Re: New Director
Subject: ProTeam renewals
Fuel 's new websites (X post)
Blue peter create a make toy
targeting groups question
XPost: Shockwave 3D game ( sort of )
Subject: RES: RES: RES: Fish Modeling
Emitting particles from object intersection
Fuel 's new websites (X post)
Subject: Re: Texturing
Big Break Contest Videos
Subject: New Plugins
Models and Texture on my updated site
Error Installing Patch tS6 6
Subject: Plasma?
Looking for Inspiration
Subject: Weird EMail Q
Subject: Re: It 's done first week ?
Subject: Cherry not cranberry
Subject: Re: New game
Camera Animation Problem
Subject: Particle plugins?
 
Kicking the programming in TrueSpace can around

Kicking the programming in TrueSpace can around

2005-06-01       - By KMKrieger

 Back
Reply:     1     2     3     4     5     6     7     8     9     10  

At 11:28 PM 31-05-05, DAVID STUBBS wrote:
>This topic has programming TrueSpace focus.
>
>The Win 32 system in XP is a significant factor in terms of processing
>speed and ram memory with 32 bit programming and a .net programming language.

Are those of W2KPro the same?  IOW are we slaved to XP or does W2KPro offer
annlaternative?

I've used XP and it drove me to re-word the old joke.  To whit:

Q.:  "How many icons-clicks does it take for XP to open a 2-line *.TXT file?"
A.:  "100 - 99 to wind through the Gorgon-like User INterface and one to
actually open  the file."

>To understand the significance of the different programming languages
>provides a rationale of system requirements when writing code for XP and
>TrueSpace.

So then, what your saying is that tS7 is slaved to XP specifically, solely,
and *exclusively* =>:-p ?

I can't comment on the rest because it is gobbldyguk to me.

- K.

>Also, in terms of just what the Win 32 system is doing within each
>programming technique applied to coding  and runtime code results. in
>terms of a system demands. or for that matter a .Net 32 bit OS .
>
>Here are a few scenerios I can think of:
>
>Low memory demands if 32 bit and procedural code such as c or c++
>functions are the main messaging.
>
>higher memory demands
>32 bit and class coding in 32 bit such as c++ , vb etc.
>class instances carry overhead when instantiated to use a function in the OS.
>
>
>still higher memory demands
>A .Net XP and a .Net programming language.
>
>
>Thanks.
>
>
>David
>
>
>__ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ______
>****************************************************************************
>********
>This message has been checked for all known viruses by the Cable & Wireless
>E-mail Virus Protection service, powered by MessageLabs.
>
>To purchase this service, please contact your Cable & Wireless Account
>Manager.
>****************************************************************************
>********


__ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ______
****************************************************************************
********
This message has been checked for all known viruses by the Cable & Wireless
E-mail Virus Protection service, powered by MessageLabs.

To purchase this service, please contact your Cable & Wireless Account
Manager.
****************************************************************************
********