 | | | unsubscribe | unsubscribe 2005-05-17 - By Stephen Perullo
Back
unsubscribe
-- --Original Message-- --
From: JP <jade@(protected)>
To: truespace@(protected)
Sent: Mon, 16 May 2005 19:02:39 -0600
Subject: Re: [TSML] Boolean after NURBS conversion
Hi Mendrak,
If you are still needing a solution there are several ways you can do
it.
I would suggest you try exporting your object out as an STL file and
them
import it back in again. Make sure that you have all the surfaces in
place
for a closed object. That will use the surface healing built into that
function to create a single solid object. You will need to have the
latest
Conversion Pack to do it.
Another way is to convert just a single surface (no blends or
stitches) to
polygons and then use the Add Face tool to fill in the holes. That
will
create a single solid object as well. You might need to add a few
edges
across the holes to get a face to follow along the surface properly.
If you have to use more than one surface then you can Boolean them
together
after they are converted to polygons and add faces then across the
gaps. Depending on the complexity of your geometry that could get
tedious. However, if you add enough edges (trial and error but try 90
degrees apart around the object) to get tS to automatically fill in
the
faces then you can triangulate and the new faces will line up flat.
Use
the Add face tool again to fill in any remaining holes and subtract a
non-interxecting object from the assembly to remove the triangulation.
Yet another way might be to use the Weld Edges Tool from CK Game
Factory. http://ckgamefactory.hp.infoseek.co.jp/tsxe/polytool.html
This might work on what you already have. I'm not sure how well that
will
work for you but it is worth a shot.
Hope this helps,
Jeff
-
At 12:06 PM 5/15/2005, you wrote:
>I was starting down the union path, but it seemed pretty laborious.
>
>I'd be very interested in the plugin code you've got. I was sitting
>here thinking that
>maybe I'd try and write a plugin that would fix seams between objects
in
>a group,
>if there wasn't already a tool like that, but maybe the better answer
is
>to convert NURBS planes
>as a single object.
>
>If you have a plugin that is close, I'd definately play with it.
>
>Of course the crazy thing is, that I'd spend lots more time
>writing/debugging code than I would
>doing the union, but maybe it would help for the next one :-).
__ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ______
****************************************************************************
********
This message has been checked for all known viruses by the Cable &
Wireless
E-mail Virus Protection service, powered by MessageLabs.
To purchase this service, please contact your Cable & Wireless Account
Manager.
****************************************************************************
********
__ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ______
****************************************************************************
********
This message has been checked for all known viruses by the Cable & Wireless
E-mail Virus Protection service, powered by MessageLabs.
To purchase this service, please contact your Cable & Wireless Account
Manager.
****************************************************************************
********
|
|
|