Recommended indirect lighting settings for "clay " renders? 2005-07-05 - By Glen Allen
Back
Sorry - that didn't work either (grrrrr)
Renamed the file:
http://ca.geocities.com/gallen8969@(protected)/testarea/lightingtest.jpg
Ringo, here's a link to a thread someone's doing (not me) on CGTalk.com:
http://www.cgtalk.com/showthread.php?t=246910&page=1
That's the kind of look I'm going for (if you can see my pic, you can
tell I'm not there yet) :)
Thanks,
Glen
-- --Original Message-- --
From: Carrara@(protected) [mailto:Carrara@(protected)] On Behalf
Of Ringo Monfort
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2005 3:34 PM
To: Carrara@(protected)
Subject: RE: [Carrara] Recommended indirect lighting settings for"clay"
renders?
Hi, Glen.
Can you point to a link with the look that you would like to achived in
Carrara?
Thanks
Ringo
>>> gallen8969@(protected) 7/5/05 12:13 PM >>>
Hi again,
Here's what I've come up with so far:
http://ca.geocities.com/gallen8969@(protected)/testarea/indirectlightingt
est.jpg
AntiAliasing: Good
Object Accuracy: 1px
Shadow Accuracy: 0.5px
...
(same as before)
...
Photon Count: 49968
Photon Map Accuracy: 45%
...
(same as before)
This took 4 min on my P4-2.6MHz (hyperthreaded) WinXPPro box with 1GB
RAM
Comments and suggestions welcome!
Cheers,
Glen
-- --Original Message-- --
From: Carrara@(protected) [mailto:Carrara@(protected)] On Behalf
Of Glen Allen
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2005 12:24 PM
To: Carrara List (Carrara List)
Subject: [Carrara] Recommended indirect lighting settings for "clay"
renders?
Hiya,
I've been playing around with the render settings trying to come up with
something that will look like the clay renders that you see on
CGTalk.com (a lot of those people are using Max with Brazil, or Maya,
etc. I think I'm getting close, but I still see some funky artifacted
shadows. Rather than spend the whole day trying settings, I was hoping
someone might make recommend some settings that would save me a bit of
time. :)
Currently, I'm using the following:
AntiAliasing: Fast
Object, Shadow Accuracy: 0.5 px
Filter Sharpness: 50% (although I've also tried 100%, but didn't really
see a diff)
Indirect Light: 100%
Interpolation: Precision: 20%
Photon Count: 60386 (should I just go higher?)
Photon Map Accuracy: 15% (up from default of 10%)
Lighting Quality: Fast
Accuracy: 1 px
I'd like to get nice results without sending my machine into a fit over
lighting calcs (the current settings aren't a problem at all.
Thanks all!
Glen
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.8/37 - Release Date: 7/1/2005
Welcome Yahoo Members!
http://www.eovia.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.8/37 - Release Date: 7/1/2005
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.8/37 - Release Date: 7/1/2005
Welcome Yahoo Members!
http://www.eovia.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
Welcome Yahoo Members!
http://www.eovia.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.8/37 - Release Date: 7/1/2005
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.8/37 - Release Date: 7/1/2005
Welcome Yahoo Members!
http://www.eovia.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Carrara/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Carrara-unsubscribe@(protected)
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|
|
