Re: Why Hexagon? 2005-05-11 - By Bob Dawson
Back
Hi, Hal.
Carrara does a number of things very well: modeling is not one of them
in my humble opinion (others may not agree).
Hexagon, on the other hand, is a very good modeler. You can't (to the
best of my knowledge) do any shading, animation or much of anything
else in Hexagon, but boy can you model.
The two go hand in hand; a symbiotic relationship, as it were.
Carrara is a good all around program, except for its modeling
capabilities. At best, Carrara's modeling barely limps along, while
Hexagon soars.
Yes, you can model in Carrara if it's all you have and you're of a
masochistic bent: but why would you when you can have Hexagon.
Model in Hexagon, render in Carrara. Ah, now that's the life.
Bob Dawson
--- In Carrara@(protected), "haldavey" <h.davey@(protected)> wrote:
> --- In Carrara@(protected), "Bob Dawson" <dawsonbob@(protected)> wrote:
> > Model.
> >
> > Bob Dawson
> >
> > --- In Carrara@(protected), "haldavey" <h.davey@(protected)> wrote:
> > > I'm new to Carrara 4 so I don't have a feel for it's strengths and
> > > weakness yet. So I was wondering why would a Carrara 4 user want
> > > Hexagon (or Amapi for that matter)? What does it do better that
> > > Carrara does not?
> > > Cheers,
> > > Hal
>
> Thanks Bob, but could you elaborate - one can model in Carrara also -
> so what aspects of modeling does Hexagon do better?
> Hal
Welcome Yahoo Members!
http://www.eovia.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Carrara/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Carrara-unsubscribe@(protected)
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|
|
