 | | | Re: Why Hexagon? | Re: Why Hexagon? 2005-05-11 - By Ringo Monfort
Back
Carrara has the Vertex Modeler but it is not as advance nor as easy to
use as Hexagon. Also if you are new to 3D and modeling by all means
get Hexagon...if you do the Vertex Modeler way you may just get turn
off at modeling. But with Hexagon you will be doing your first simple
models so fast you will want to model even more. With the Vertex
Modeler you will hit your head against the wall a few times after
spending hours on your model than wanting to trace back steps and redo
them and finding out that you just have to start all over again. But
with Hexagon you have a history of the steps you did and go back and
edit them. You will get spoiled....and for 99 bucks why not.
Later
Ringo
--- In Carrara@(protected), "haldavey" <h.davey@(protected)> wrote:
> --- In Carrara@(protected), "Bob Dawson" <dawsonbob@(protected)> wrote:
> > Model.
> >
> > Bob Dawson
> >
> > --- In Carrara@(protected), "haldavey" <h.davey@(protected)> wrote:
> > > I'm new to Carrara 4 so I don't have a feel for it's strengths and
> > > weakness yet. So I was wondering why would a Carrara 4 user want
> > > Hexagon (or Amapi for that matter)? What does it do better that
> > > Carrara does not?
> > > Cheers,
> > > Hal
>
> Thanks Bob, but could you elaborate - one can model in Carrara also -
> so what aspects of modeling does Hexagon do better?
> Hal
Welcome Yahoo Members!
http://www.eovia.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Carrara/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Carrara-unsubscribe@(protected)
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|
|
|