Witch one looks right to you ? 2004-07-16 - By K M Krieger
Back
At 10:11 PM 12-07-04, RorrKonn wrote:
><http://www.atomic-3 (See http://mic-3.ora-code.com)d.com/RK_head.jpg>http://www.atomic-3 (See http://mic-3.ora-code.com)d.com/RK_head.jpg
Ah! OK. 5.27 to 7, 8, 8.5, and maybe 9 look like proportions I've seen
WHat I notice is that the top of the head loos a bit too squared (I might
be wrong but my impression is that the front of the top of the skull tends
to be narrowed on top in comparison to the rear of the top of the
skull). And the eyes seem to be reversed left to right - IOW, the lowest
part of the eye would be more to the middle or a bit towards the outside,
but again, that's just my impression and not at all any sort of "hard fact".
HTH...
>
><http://www.atomic-3 (See http://mic-3.ora-code.com)d.com/RK_body.jpg>http://www.atomic-3 (See http://mic-3.ora-code.com)d.com/RK_body.<http:/
/www.atomic-3 (See http://mic-3.ora-code.com)d.com/RK_body.jpg>jpg
Dicier. If you use the "flattened head", i.e. broader, it might show up on
a more thickset body with wider hips. The thing is that I've seen all
sorts of bodies and very few of those have been "ideal", because the
"ideal" seems to me to be based upon some sort of statistical
averages. But generally, the shoulders seem a bit too wide (or maybe
actualy it's that the hips/waists seem too narrow) to me for a real human
model. For a superhero or "mechano-man", it'd definitely work for all of them.
OTOH, all of that might be a sort of "ethnic thing" in that I grew up in an
area where more people tended to be on the "stockier" side, than were on
the tall/slender end of the spectrum, especially in my immediate family, so
I have a sort of cultural inclination towards people who are "solidly
built" as we always described it.
HTH tho' I don't know whether it does...
- Kris K.
|
|
