2.0 and 3.0 question 2004-02-17 - By nospam
Back
Bonjour,
Another good reason is that in some rare case, some C2 scenes are
broken / cannot be rendered in C3.
This is the case with a lens made of a formula that perfectly render
in C2 but doesn't in C3 due to a bug that as not been addresses in the
patches yet.
Le / On mardi 17 f�vrier 2004, vous �criviez / You wrote :
NS> The ONLY advantage I can think of to keeping 2.0 on your computer, is
NS> that if someone who doesn't have 3.0 sent you a file and wanted your
NS> help, you couldn't make changes to it in 3.0 and then send it back to
NS> them, because they wouldn't be able to open the file. What I mean is,
NS> 3.0 can open 2.0 files, but 2.0 CAN NOT open 3.0 files.
NS> James Davis wrote on 2/17/2004, 1:32 PM:
>> Is there anything in Carrara 2.0 package that is not in 3.0, or any
>> advantages to retaining 2.0 if you get the 3?
NS> To unsubscribe send a message to
NS> Carrara-unsubscribe@(protected)
NS> Yahoo! Groups Links
--
Cordialement / Sincerly yours,
nospam
Flocons de P�ques
Infographie 2D et 3D - Cr�ation web - Services informatiques
www.floconsdepaques.com
Pi�ces jointes / Post-Joint : <none>.
To unsubscribe send a message to
Carrara-unsubscribe@(protected)
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Carrara/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Carrara-unsubscribe@(protected)
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|
|
