Subject: OT: crazy rendertree 2005-06-30 - By Francois Lord
Back
Actually, any tree based compositing software can do this. It would be
extremely useful to have that in the render tree. And once you can
collapse nodes into a group, you're one step closer to be able to make
your own macros.
kim aldis wrote:
>You need to be able to collapse nodes, like in the schematic. Eddie could do
>this, not brilliantly but it was helpful
>
>
>
>>-- --Original Message-- --
>>From: owner-xsi@(protected)
>>[mailto:owner-xsi@(protected)] On Behalf Of Arvid Bj?rn
>>Sent: 30 June 2005 12:19
>>To: XSI@(protected)
>>Subject: Re: OT: crazy rendertree
>>
>>I usually stack all nodes that arent branched into little
>>heaps of nodes, to keep different parts of the tree neatly
>>separated, see attached. Perhaps a real grouping feature
>>would be nice, like Shake.
>>
>>peterb wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>overall I think there is still room for streamlining XSI in
>>>
>>>
>>this area.
>>
>>
>>>eg. all the conversion nodes (color2scalar and so) can
>>>
>>>
>>really clutter
>>
>>
>>>up things.
>>>why have a seperate node to go from one to another?
>>>perhaps this could be added within the connection line, and if you
>>>would right click on the line, you'd be able to see the conversion
>>>properties.
>>>...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>--
>>Vfx Artist | palladiumfilm
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>---
>Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo@(protected) with the following text in body:
>unsubscribe xsi
>
>
>
---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo@(protected) with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi
|
|
