  | | | CPUs and XSI/mental ray... | CPUs and XSI/mental ray... 2005-06-22 - By Alan Jones
Back Overclockers.co.uk are saying they should have them in on the 24th June (I'm sorting a new PC at the moment and trying to decide whether to splurge or not...)
Cheers,
Alan.
On 6/21/05, Lee Hallett <lee.hallett@(protected)> wrote: > > Cheers Brad - what's the availabillity of dual core like at the moment? I > thought they weren't readily available for a while? > > Cheers for the tips on cache (and it's relative importance) and the memory > controller issues on dual procs. > > > > > > Lee|3d animation and design.. > > Pixel pusher & 'telly colouring in' bloke > > There are only 10 sorts of people in the World - those that understand > binary, and those that don't. > > > > * BBC Wales | C4 graphics area | Broadcasting House| Llandaff, > Cardiff. CF5 2QY. > ( +44 (0)29 203 23370 > e-* lee.hallett@(protected) > > > -- --Original Message-- -- > From: owner-xsi@(protected) [mailto:owner-xsi@(protected)] On Behalf Of > Brad Friedman > Sent: 21 June 2005 14:19 > To: XSI@(protected) > Subject: Re: CPUs and XSI/mental ray... > > The larger the cache, the better. Especially for rendering. A larger cache > means more rendering binary code can live closer to the CPU along with more > data. Since rendering is such a repetitive process, cache is very > important. It keeps one from taking too many memory access performance > hits. > > I have seen nothing but stunning benchmark results for AMD Dual Core chips. > > As far as motherboards go, when it comes to AMD opteron dual proc systems, > there are two main types: > > 1) The type in which a single memory controller is shared between the CPUs > (in which case one CPU has slower memory access due to using a > hypertransport pipe to get access to main memory) > > 2) The type in which each CPU has its own dedicated memory controller. This > is faster. > > The introduction of dual core opterons will make for a frightening machine > for certain, with four cores spread over two CPUs. Though, with the > uncertainty of mental ray licensing on dual cores... I don't know how that > works out with regards to $$. Anyone know if mental images ever got around > to telling us how licensing will be affected by dual core chips? > > -brad > > Lee Hallett wrote: > > > Very basic question: given the currently available hardware, what's the best > processor for a kick-ass XSI/mental ray workstation? Any noteable > considerations (Cache/motherboards etc) > > *sorry, I know this should go to the hardware list, but the reponse is > always minimal!* > > > > Lee|3d animation and design.. > > Pixel pusher & 'telly colouring in' bloke > > There are only 10 sorts of people in the World - those that understand > binary, and those that don't. > > > > * BBC Wales | C4 graphics area | Broadcasting House| Llandaff, > Cardiff. CF5 2QY. > ( +44 (0)29 203 23370 > e-* lee.hallett@(protected) > > > http://www.bbc.co.uk/ > > This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain > personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically > stated. > If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system. > Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in > reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the > BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. > Further communication will signify your consent to this. > > http://www.bbc.co.uk/ > > This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain > personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically > stated. > If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system. > Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in > reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the > BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. > Further communication will signify your consent to this.
--- Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo@(protected) with the following text in body: unsubscribe xsi
|
|
 |