XSI Petition 2005-05-31 - By Gene Crucean
Back
See, I think the biggest reason soft should look into this is because
of the whole education possibility. Think of how big apple is within
educational facilities and think of where and what those people using
those macs are going to want to use after they graduate. IMO, that's
when you would want to get xsi into the users hands... for the long
run anyways.
-gc
On 5/31/05, Raffaele ThE_JacO Fragapane <jaco@(protected)> wrote:
> May I be so blunt to point out the major flaw in these polls?
>
> They keep recurring on the list, cgtalk, xsibase, at usergroups...
>
> Now, please remind me what the amount of new licenses Soft would sell could
> be if the poll was successful between people who are ALREADY for the vast
> majority XSI users.
> In my book it would be between 5 and 20 ;)
>
> If you want these polls to have any weight start evangelizing the mac
> userbase that doesn't know XSI yet, and poll THEM for opinions.
> Actually now that I think of it, that was done on some mainstream OS-X forum
> some time ago, and the result of the poll were something like:
>
> 1) Not interested, the apps we already have are more then enough for me
> [37%]
> 2) would consider it if the price was brought down to line up with maya's
> and C4D (it was before foundation) [10%]
> 3) Yes! I'd be all over it [3%]
> 4) what's XSI? [50%]
>
> This is off the top of my head, but I think they are quite close to what the
> poll resulted into, try looking for cached forum pages on google maybe.
>
> I sort of like macs nowadays, and I COULD consider an Apple laptop one day
> if more SW I need gets ported to it and if Apple stops screwing with some
> companies, but I can't see the mac userbase to be this huge pool Soft really
> and absolutely wants to tap.
>
> From my days in Avid my experience with managing a mac userbase, and
> relationships with Apple, is that it's usually usually a serious PITA.
>
> P.S.
> They do have the sexiest workstation case with the G5 and the 30"
> cinemadisplay is gorgeous, shame the CPUs still come out as disappointing in
> all we tested here (we have a fair deal of G5s for shake and tryied some
> stuff on it)
>
> -- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---
> ~Raffaele Fragapane
> ~Lead "I'm sure we can make it work"
> ~Peerless Camera Company
> -- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---
>
>
>
> -- --Original Message-- --
> From: owner-xsi@(protected) [mailto:owner-xsi@(protected)] On Behalf Of
> kim aldis
> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 8:36 AM
> To: XSI@(protected)
> Subject: RE: XSI Petition
>
> Maybe that's because everyone wants to use Xsi on OSX ;-)
>
>
> > -- --Original Message-- --
> > From: owner-xsi@(protected)
> > [mailto:owner-xsi@(protected)] On Behalf Of Matt Lind
> > Sent: 30 May 2005 09:24
> > To: xsi@(protected)
> > Subject: RE: XSI Petition
> >
> That being the case, common sense
> > says there's going to be even less interest (or
> > need) to port XSI to OSX.
> >
>
> ---
> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo@(protected) with the following text in body:
> unsubscribe xsi
>
> ---
> Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.859 / Virus Database: 585 - Release Date: 14-Feb-05 (See http://Feb-05.ora-code.com)
>
>
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.859 / Virus Database: 585 - Release Date: 14-Feb-05 (See http://Feb-05.ora-code.com)
>
>
> ---
> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo@(protected) with the following text in body:
> unsubscribe xsi
>
---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo@(protected) with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi
|
|
