 | | | Reference model question | Reference model question 2005-05-09 - By Andy Jones
Back
I guess the backup plan would be to eliminate all the instances. Of
course, I've heard the resulting scenario,
Chair Model (reference)
---> leg geometry
---> leg geometry
---> leg geometry
---> leg geometry
Chair Model (reference)
Chair Model (reference)
Chair Model (reference),
comes with its fair share of pitfalls anyway.
-Andy
Bradley R. Gabe wrote:
> I would say approach this with the highest order of doubt. Make sure
> you have a backup plan. Assume it's not going to work, until you test
> it thoroughly.
>
> -Brad
>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a general question about reference models. Does anyone know
>> if there are any issues I'm likely to encounter using instances with
>> reference models? I know there can be problems with nested models in
>> general, as mentioned in a recent post. The project involves a house
>> with pieces of furniture. We're planning to use reference models for
>> the individual furniture models. What we'd like to have is:
>>
>> Chair Model (reference)
>> ---> Leg Model
>> ---> Leg Model (instance)
>> ---> Leg Model (instance)
>> ---> Leg Model (instance)
>> Chair Model (instance)
>> Chair Model (instance)
>> Chair Model (instance)
>>
>> Does anyone know if this is likely to cause problems? I don't think
>> we'd need to have any links into the scene from beneath the Leg Model
>> null. Hopefully this doesn't cause problems, as it seems like it's
>> really the only sensible way to organize the geometry...
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Andy
>> ---
>> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo@(protected) with the following text in
>> body:
>> unsubscribe xsi
>
>
> ---
> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo@(protected) with the following text in
> body:
> unsubscribe xsi
>
---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo@(protected) with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi
|
|
|