OT (I think not): NO shadows in Heaven 2004-02-18 - By Jonathan G. Koehn
Back
I would request this stop.
You may be intending just to hurt the writer, which of itself is wrong,
but beyond that you are hurting many others.
I'm not saying I go with or against the orginal email, but these follow up
are in bad taste as well, if some not being worse.
Best,
-Jonathan G. Koehn
-- -- Original Message -- --
From: "Spencer Britton" <spencerbritton@(protected)>
To: <truespace@(protected)>
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 4:02 PM
Subject: Re: [TSML] OT (I think not): NO shadows in Heaven
> My thoughts exactly.
> > At 05:56 AM 18-02-04, Norbert E?er wrote:
> > >Brittney Spears is stupid and ugly. Bush is god too and i am a polygon
based
> > >Jesus.
> >
> > I'm a polycellulose-based treesus...all hail the dendrites, maestroes of
> > the Xylemphloem, for they are a woody race...
> >
> > >Postscript
> > >I do NOT apologize
> >
> > Apologia...? Et Poe, Logia!! Ahhh, logia; as with thesis and
anti-thesis,
> > Logos alternates with anti-logos to create logorythms, which are what is
> > played on the afore-mentioned xylemphloem.
> >
> > >for posting this, if anyone should be
> > >offended at it.
> >
> > Upended? Appended? Backended...?
> > Does this not then beg the question, Just whose backend is it
> > anyway? Evidence suggests it is not mine, ergo, it must be someone
> > else's. Scientific studies are currently underway to determine once and
> > for all just how one differentiates one's own backend from that of
> > another. This research is, however, being stymied by the recent
discovery
> > by a group of anthropologists, orchid-hunters, and would-be croc o' Dial
> > hunters, of an isolated tribe of people who walk backwards, thus making
> > thair backends their frontends, and visa-versa. Meanwhile, the hunters
> > had, as part of a secondary expedition, not discovered the crocs o'
Dial,
> > thus were unable to take baths - they di, however, discovered crocs of
> > other substances which did not permit close examination.
> >
> > >Any flaming that may arise is ignored in its entirety.
> >
> > What's that you said...?
> > Any flimflamming that meets one's eyes should be Eyored....?
> > Someone's film is an eyesore...? SOmeone has a cold and their eye is
sore
> > and filmy...?
> >
> > Just what is going on here? I'm so confusioned. And confissioned. My
> > molecules, you see, oscillate between splitting and joining in a chaotic
> > pattern that falls into the category of a strange attractor, which
> > maintains my corpulent corpus. Corpus vibrillosum so to speak. Esprit
de
> > corpus so to speak.
> >
> > Assuming some sort of anti-vaporizations widget:
> > Would one cast a shadow if one stood on the surface of the sun?
> > Would one cast a shadow if one were at the center of the sun?
> >
> > - Kris K.
>
>
>
|
|
