Mailing List
Home
Forum Home
Softimage
Carrara
trueSpace
Dir3d-l
Maya - a powerful 3D animation and visual effects software
Macromedia Flash Development
Subjects
Cameras
scaleDown command
black out solved
Aircraft Tutorial
Mathematical XYZ ?
Its done This vs That
Its done first week
recommendations for screen video captures?
3DExplorer "Oddity "
New Director
ProTeam renewals
Fuel 's new websites (X post)
Blue peter create a make toy
targeting groups question
XPost: Shockwave 3D game ( sort of )
RES: RES: RES: Fish Modeling
Emitting particles from object intersection
Fuel 's new websites (X post)
Texturing
Big Break Contest Videos
New Plugins
Models and Texture on my updated site
Error Installing Patch tS6 6
Plasma?
Looking for Inspiration
Weird EMail Q
It 's done first week ?
Cherry not cranberry
New game
Camera Animation Problem
Particle plugins?
 
64 Bit XSI

64 Bit XSI

2005-04-26       - By Ing. Marek Mihok

 Back
Reply:     1     2     3     4     5     6     7     8     9     10     >>  

http://www.xsibase.com/news.php?detail=1356

nice snapshot added :)

memory usage = 3.612.324 K
triangles = 96 170 506 cool :)
-- ---- ---- ---- ---- -----
Ing. Marek Mihok - ANIMAX 3D
Juzna Trieda 9
040 01 Kosice
SLOVAKIA
+00421 905 316 504
animax3d@(protected)

 -- --Original Message-- --
 From: owner-xsi@(protected) [mailto:owner-xsi@(protected)]On Behalf Of
Brad Friedman
 Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 6:20 AM
 To: XSI@(protected)
 Subject: Re: 64 Bit XSI


 you don't neccesarily need to recode.  sometimes just a recompile to a
64bit binary with the right compiler flags will boost you without changing a
line of source (assuming you didn't hardcode yourself into a 32 bit
environment with your pointers).

 Also, JIT compiled languages such as Java or dotNet (c# etc.) will also
just go faster as long as the JIT engine installed is a 64 bit engine that
compiles to 64 bit code. No recompile of your software required.

 XSI is neither.  But the latest MS Office is actually largely dotNet and
will get a speed boost.  Which is kinda funny... given that MS Word is the
last program I can think of that would actually benefit from a 64 bit
execution environment.

 As far as the actual speed boost goes, Its a bit contentious.  Intel was
arguing for a long time that they had already extended their 32 bit
processors to have some 64bit lengthed registers to process floating point
numbers of such magnitude in one instruction.  And hence, they argued, no
need to go 64 bit.  But its really tough to sort out the fud from the
marketing from the truth.  So in the end it'll probably end up being a
benchmark war.  We really need to get some good solid XSI test scene
benchmarks btw.  I've not seen any.  And they can really be useful for
sorting out the reality of all these hardware configs.  Mental ray
performance is one thing but I'd really like to see some scenes that test
out XSI's vertex processing in viewports.

 -brad

 Simon Pickard wrote:
Thanks everyone for the answers..
Yeah that's what I kind of thought, just moving to 64bit wont make
anything faster unless you code it to take advantage.
If you read some of the stuff out there it's almost as if just sticking a
64bit clip in there magiclly increases your speed tenfold! Grr! Marketing!
Grr!

Regards,
Simon

 Simon, 64bit would not really make software faster unless the software
performs operations which are 64-bit on the 'inside'. This is my
understanding. Also, chips like Opteron have twice as many registers as
Xeons, to my awareness, hence using those extra registers can make
software
faster.
At least that's my understanding.
What I wonder though is that they never mention XSI 4.2, but a
'prototype'.
So perhaps it's a prototype of v4.5 or 5.0 ? :-)

   -- --Original Message-- --
From: owner-xsi@(protected) [mailto:owner-xsi@(protected)] On Behalf
Of Simon Pickard
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2005 8:33 PM
To: XSI@(protected)
Subject: Re: 64 Bit XSI

Hi there,

Just a quick question as I don't fully understand all this 64bit stuff.
I understand that moving to 64bit allows extra memory, but why will
moving
to 64bit make xsi any faster?

Regards,
Simon


     Actually, I can't wait to install a 64bit Linux distro on my dual
opteron system, with XSI 64bit. Hopefully that will just smoke
everything I could exprience so far :-D

Bernard



lpiasecki76 wrote:

       Sounds very interesting. I wonder what kind of speed improvements
can
         we
     expect and are they due to the extra RAM or perhaps the software is
compiled
specifically for Opterons, in which case it would be using the extra
registers.
Can't wait! That's indeed great news especially now when we're
         upgrading
     to
64bit dual Opteron systems.

Luke






         -- --Original Message-- --
From: owner-xsi@(protected) [mailto:owner-xsi@(protected)] On
           Behalf
     Of pargana.r@(protected)
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2005 7:16 PM
To: xsi@(protected)
Subject: 64 Bit XSI


Avid to Preview 64-bit SOFTIMAGE|XSI Software at Microsoft Conference


http://www.avid.com/company/releases/2005/050425_64bit_soft.html

Rui Santos.

__ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ __
Novo Servico IOL Dicionarios. 13 Linguas diferentes!
Saiba mais - http://www.iol.pt/correio/rodape.php?dst=0501251

---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo@(protected) with the following text in
body:
unsubscribe xsi


           ---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo@(protected) with the following text in
body:
unsubscribe xsi



         ---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo@(protected) with the following text in
       body:
     unsubscribe xsi

       ---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo@(protected) with the following text in
body:
unsubscribe xsi
     ---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo@(protected) with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi



---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo@(protected) with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi


<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html;charset=ISO-8859 (See http://ISO-8859.ora-code.com)-1>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2627" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY text=#000000 bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><A
href="http://www.xsibase.com/news.php?detail=1356">http://www.xsibase.com/news
.php?detail=1356</A></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=812320815-26042005><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>nice
snapshot added :)</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=812320815-26042005><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=812320815-26042005><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2
>memory
usage&nbsp;= 3.612.324 K</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=812320815-26042005><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>triangles = 96 170 506 cool :)</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<P><FONT size=2>-- ---- ---- ---- ---- -----<BR>Ing. Marek Mihok - ANIMAX
3D<BR>Juzna Trieda 9<BR>040 01 Kosice<BR>SLOVAKIA<BR>+00421 905 316
504<BR>animax3d@(protected) </FONT></P>
<BLOCKQUOTE>
 <DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr align=left><FONT face=Tahoma
 size=2>-- --Original Message-- --<BR><B>From:</B> owner-xsi@(protected)
 [mailto:owner-xsi@(protected)]<B>On Behalf Of </B>Brad
 Friedman<BR><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, April 26, 2005 6:20 AM<BR><B>To:</B>
 XSI@(protected)<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: 64 Bit XSI<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>you
 don't neccesarily need to recode.&nbsp; sometimes just a recompile to a 64bit
 binary with the right compiler flags will boost you without changing a line
of
 source (assuming you didn't hardcode yourself into a 32 bit environment with
 your pointers).<BR><BR>Also, JIT compiled languages such as Java or dotNet (c
#
 etc.) will also just go faster as long as the JIT engine installed is a 64
bit
 engine that compiles to 64 bit code. No recompile of your software
 required.<BR><BR>XSI is neither.&nbsp; But the latest MS Office is actually
 largely dotNet and will get a speed boost.&nbsp; Which is kinda funny...
given
 that MS Word is the last program I can think of that would actually benefit
 from a 64 bit execution environment.<BR><BR>As far as the actual speed boost
 goes, Its a bit contentious.&nbsp; Intel was arguing for a long time that
they
 had already extended their 32 bit processors to have some 64bit lengthed
 registers to process floating point numbers of such magnitude in one
 instruction.&nbsp; And hence, they argued, no need to go 64 bit.&nbsp; But
its
 really tough to sort out the fud from the marketing from the truth.&nbsp; So
 in the end it'll probably end up being a benchmark war.&nbsp; We really need
 to get some good solid XSI test scene benchmarks btw.&nbsp; I've not seen
 any.&nbsp; And they can really be useful for sorting out the reality of all
 these hardware configs.&nbsp; Mental ray performance is one thing but I'd
 really like to see some scenes that test out XSI's vertex processing in
 viewports.<BR><BR>-brad<BR><BR>Simon Pickard wrote:
 <BLOCKQUOTE
 cite=mid59479.203.94.168.166.1114479103.squirrel@(protected)
 type="cite"><PRE wrap="">Thanks everyone for the answers..
Yeah that's what I kind of thought, just moving to 64bit wont make
anything faster unless you code it to take advantage.
If you read some of the stuff out there it's almost as if just sticking a
64bit clip in there magiclly increases your speed tenfold! Grr! Marketing!
Grr!

Regards,
Simon

 </PRE>
   <BLOCKQUOTE type="cite"><PRE wrap="">Simon, 64bit would not really make
software faster unless the software
performs operations which are 64-bit on the 'inside'. This is my
understanding. Also, chips like Opteron have twice as many registers as
Xeons, to my awareness, hence using those extra registers can make
software
faster.
At least that's my understanding.
What I wonder though is that they never mention XSI 4.2, but a
'prototype'.
So perhaps it's a prototype of v4.5 or 5.0 ? :-)

   </PRE>
     <BLOCKQUOTE type="cite"><PRE wrap="">-- --Original Message-- --
From: <A class=moz-txt-link-abbreviated href="mailto:owner-xsi@(protected)"
>owner-xsi@(protected)</A> [<A class=moz-txt-link-freetext href="mailto:owner
-xsi@(protected)">mailto:owner-xsi@(protected)</A>] On Behalf
Of Simon Pickard
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2005 8:33 PM
To: <A class=moz-txt-link-abbreviated href="mailto:XSI@(protected)">XSI
@(protected)</A>
Subject: Re: 64 Bit XSI

Hi there,

Just a quick question as I don't fully understand all this 64bit stuff.
I understand that moving to 64bit allows extra memory, but why will
moving
to 64bit make xsi any faster?

Regards,
Simon


     </PRE>
       <BLOCKQUOTE type="cite"><PRE wrap="">Actually, I can't wait to install
a 64bit Linux distro on my dual
opteron system, with XSI 64bit. Hopefully that will just smoke
everything I could exprience so far :-D

Bernard



lpiasecki76 wrote:

       </PRE>
         <BLOCKQUOTE type="cite"><PRE wrap="">Sounds very interesting. I
wonder what kind of speed improvements can
         </PRE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE><PRE wrap="">we
     </PRE>
       <BLOCKQUOTE type="cite">
         <BLOCKQUOTE type="cite"><PRE wrap="">expect and are they due to the
extra RAM or perhaps the software is
compiled
specifically for Opterons, in which case it would be using the extra
registers.
Can't wait! That's indeed great news especially now when we're
         </PRE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE><PRE wrap="">upgrading
     </PRE>
       <BLOCKQUOTE type="cite">
         <BLOCKQUOTE type="cite"><PRE wrap="">to
64bit dual Opteron systems.

Luke






         </PRE>
           <BLOCKQUOTE type="cite"><PRE wrap="">-- --Original Message-- --
From: <A class=moz-txt-link-abbreviated href="mailto:owner-xsi@(protected)"
>owner-xsi@(protected)</A> [<A class=moz-txt-link-freetext href="mailto:owner
-xsi@(protected)">mailto:owner-xsi@(protected)</A>] On
           </PRE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE><PRE wrap="">Behalf
     </PRE>
       <BLOCKQUOTE type="cite">
         <BLOCKQUOTE type="cite">
           <BLOCKQUOTE type="cite"><PRE wrap="">Of <A class=moz-txt-link
-abbreviated href="mailto:pargana.r@(protected)">pargana.r@(protected)</A>
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2005 7:16 PM
To: <A class=moz-txt-link-abbreviated href="mailto:xsi@(protected)">xsi
@(protected)</A>
Subject: 64 Bit XSI


Avid to Preview 64-bit SOFTIMAGE|XSI Software at Microsoft Conference


<A class=moz-txt-link-freetext href="http://www.avid.com/company/releases/2005
/050425_64bit_soft.html">http://www.avid.com/company/releases/2005/050425_64bit
_soft.html</A>

Rui Santos.

__ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ __
Novo Servico IOL Dicionarios. 13 Linguas diferentes!
Saiba mais - <A class=moz-txt-link-freetext href="http://www.iol.pt/correio
/rodape.php?dst=0501251">http://www.iol.pt/correio/rodape.php?dst=0501251</A>

---
Unsubscribe? Mail <A class=moz-txt-link-abbreviated href="mailto:Majordomo
@(protected)">Majordomo@(protected)</A> with the following text in
body:
unsubscribe xsi


           </PRE></BLOCKQUOTE><PRE wrap="">---
Unsubscribe? Mail <A class=moz-txt-link-abbreviated href="mailto:Majordomo
@(protected)">Majordomo@(protected)</A> with the following text in
body:
unsubscribe xsi



         </PRE></BLOCKQUOTE><PRE wrap="">---
Unsubscribe? Mail <A class=moz-txt-link-abbreviated href="mailto:Majordomo
@(protected)">Majordomo@(protected)</A> with the following text in
       </PRE></BLOCKQUOTE><PRE wrap="">body:
     </PRE>
       <BLOCKQUOTE type="cite"><PRE wrap="">unsubscribe xsi

       </PRE></BLOCKQUOTE><PRE wrap="">---
Unsubscribe? Mail <A class=moz-txt-link-abbreviated href="mailto:Majordomo
@(protected)">Majordomo@(protected)</A> with the following text in
body:
unsubscribe xsi
     </PRE></BLOCKQUOTE><PRE wrap="">---
Unsubscribe? Mail <A class=moz-txt-link-abbreviated href="mailto:Majordomo
@(protected)">Majordomo@(protected)</A> with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi

   </PRE></BLOCKQUOTE><PRE wrap=""><!---->

---
Unsubscribe? Mail <A class=moz-txt-link-abbreviated href="mailto:Majordomo
@(protected)">Majordomo@(protected)</A> with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi
 </PRE></BLOCKQUOTE><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>