 | | | FX Tree Plugin Support / NAB 2005 - a bit disappointed | FX Tree Plugin Support / NAB 2005 - a bit disappointed 2005-04-21 - By Michael Klein
Back
I just would say: Copy Shake features to FxTree and we will have one of the
best and most advanced comp tool out there.
We use FxTree for 90% of all compositings. But unfortunately it's just the
common and basic node stuff.
For some advanced effects we still have to switch to AFX which is not
perfect for a clean workflow.
FxTree is great but unfinished yet because you can't really solve 100% with
it.
President
-- --Original Message-- --
From: owner-xsi@(protected) [mailto:owner-xsi@(protected)] On Behalf Of
Eric Lampi
Posted At: Thursday, April 21, 2005 5:46 PM
Posted To: XSI
Conversation: FX Tree Plugin Support / NAB 2005 - a bit disappointed
Subject: Re: FX Tree Plugin Support / NAB 2005 - a bit disappointed
Yeah I hear ya.
I'm a big fan of the FXtree. It's a huge waste of time to have to go
outside the package, but sometimes not being able to use all of the nice AE
plugins makes it impossible not to use it.
At the very least being able to pipe your clips into the FXtree and
adjusting them saves me a lot of time, and it's great not to have to always
rely on a pre-rendered sequence of files.
Eric
--- Todd Alan Peleg <trent716@(protected)> wrote:
> On this thought.... i had always believed (based on being told) that
> eventually the fxtree would support the AEX plugins that work in after
> effects... so.. i have been anxiously waiting for that...though the
> reelsmart conversion is a great thing.
>
> todd
>
> Dan Yargici wrote:
>
> > Interesting indeed.
> >
> > Does anyone know if the FXTree will be getting
> OpenFX plugin support
> > in the future?
> >
> > When I mailed Frishluft about porting Lenscare to
> the FXtree they said
> > only if it supported OpenFX. I can understand why
> this would be too,
> > why spend all that energy writing a dozen
> different versions of the
> > same thing when you could use it on improving the
> product (all though
> > having an FXTree specific (UFO) port would
> obviouly still be
> > advantagous as we've seen with RSMB and the
> ability to tag objects for
> > blur etc..).
> >
> > Just curious really.
> >
> > DAN
> >
> >
> > Will Mendez wrote:
> >
> >>
>
http://www.h-digital.com.au/news/newsitemview.asp?id=5
> >>
> >>
>
http://www.digitalvideoediting.com/articles/viewarticle.jsp?id=31942
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -- --Original Message-- --
> >> From: owner-xsi@(protected)
> [mailto:owner-xsi@(protected)] On Behalf
> >> Of Andre DeAngelis
> >> Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2005 9:36 AM
> >> To: XSI@(protected)
> >> Subject: RE: NAB 2005 - a bit disappointed
> >>
> >>
> >> In fact I can't seem to get much information t
> all about. The only
> >> announcement seems to be Shake 4 and FCP 5.
> >>
> >> Pretty disappointed with the reports personally.
> >>
> >> -- --Original Message-- --
> >> From: owner-xsi@(protected)
> [mailto:owner-xsi@(protected)] On Behalf
> >> Of Bernard Lebel
> >> Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 7:58 PM
> >> To: XSI@(protected)
> >> Subject: Re: NAB 2005 - a bit disappointed
> >>
> >> I don't recall you being pleased about XSI,
> Luke.... ;-)
> >>
> >> As far as I can tell, the big news with XSI have
> always been at
> >> Siggraph....
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >> Bernard
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> lpiasecki76 wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> I must admit that I'm a bit disappointed at the
> lack of any major news
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> during NAB 2005.
> >>>
> >>> There are certain limitations in the software
> that I was hoping would
> >>> get addressed in a new version, but this was
> probably the quietest NAB
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> show in the history of XSI.
> >>>
> >>> I really hope that the development speed and
> cycles did not change to
> >>> that of Maya...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ---
> >> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo@(protected) with
> the following text in
> >> body:
> >> unsubscribe xsi
> >>
> >> ---
> >> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo@(protected) with
> the following text in
> >> body:
> >> unsubscribe xsi
> >>
> >> ---
> >> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo@(protected) with
> the following text in
> >> body:
> >> unsubscribe xsi
> >>
> >>
> >>
> > ---
> > Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo@(protected) with the
> following text in
> > body:
> > unsubscribe xsi
> >
>
Freelance 3-D Animator, F/X Artist, Particle Man
---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo@(protected) with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi
---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo@(protected) with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi
|
|
|