 | | | FX Tree Plugin Support / NAB 2005 - a bit disappointed | FX Tree Plugin Support / NAB 2005 - a bit disappointed 2005-04-21 - By Todd Alan Peleg
Back
On this thought.... i had always believed (based on being told) that
eventually the fxtree would support the AEX plugins that work in after
effects... so.. i have been anxiously waiting for that...though the
reelsmart conversion is a great thing.
todd
Dan Yargici wrote:
> Interesting indeed.
>
> Does anyone know if the FXTree will be getting OpenFX plugin support
> in the future?
>
> When I mailed Frishluft about porting Lenscare to the FXtree they said
> only if it supported OpenFX. I can understand why this would be too,
> why spend all that energy writing a dozen different versions of the
> same thing when you could use it on improving the product (all though
> having an FXTree specific (UFO) port would obviouly still be
> advantagous as we've seen with RSMB and the ability to tag objects for
> blur etc..).
>
> Just curious really.
>
> DAN
>
>
> Will Mendez wrote:
>
>> http://www.h-digital.com.au/news/newsitemview.asp?id=5
>>
>> http://www.digitalvideoediting.com/articles/viewarticle.jsp?id=31942
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- --Original Message-- --
>> From: owner-xsi@(protected) [mailto:owner-xsi@(protected)] On Behalf
>> Of Andre DeAngelis
>> Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2005 9:36 AM
>> To: XSI@(protected)
>> Subject: RE: NAB 2005 - a bit disappointed
>>
>>
>> In fact I can't seem to get much information t all about. The only
>> announcement seems to be Shake 4 and FCP 5.
>>
>> Pretty disappointed with the reports personally.
>>
>> -- --Original Message-- --
>> From: owner-xsi@(protected) [mailto:owner-xsi@(protected)] On Behalf
>> Of Bernard Lebel
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 7:58 PM
>> To: XSI@(protected)
>> Subject: Re: NAB 2005 - a bit disappointed
>>
>> I don't recall you being pleased about XSI, Luke.... ;-)
>>
>> As far as I can tell, the big news with XSI have always been at
>> Siggraph....
>>
>> Cheers
>> Bernard
>>
>>
>>
>> lpiasecki76 wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> I must admit that I'm a bit disappointed at the lack of any major news
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> during NAB 2005.
>>>
>>> There are certain limitations in the software that I was hoping would
>>> get addressed in a new version, but this was probably the quietest NAB
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> show in the history of XSI.
>>>
>>> I really hope that the development speed and cycles did not change to
>>> that of Maya...
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---
>> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo@(protected) with the following text in
>> body:
>> unsubscribe xsi
>>
>> ---
>> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo@(protected) with the following text in
>> body:
>> unsubscribe xsi
>>
>> ---
>> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo@(protected) with the following text in
>> body:
>> unsubscribe xsi
>>
>>
>>
> ---
> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo@(protected) with the following text in
> body:
> unsubscribe xsi
>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859 (See http://ISO-8859.ora-code.com)-1">
<title></title>
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
On this thought.... i had always believed (based on being told) that <i
>eventually</i>
the fxtree would support the AEX plugins that work in after effects...
so.. i have been anxiously waiting for that...though the reelsmart
conversion is a great thing.<br>
<br>
todd<br>
<br>
Dan Yargici wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid4267BB0E.2040002@(protected)">Interesting
indeed.
<br>
<br>
Does anyone know if the FXTree will be getting OpenFX plugin support in
the future?
<br>
<br>
When I mailed Frishluft about porting Lenscare to the FXtree they said
only if it supported OpenFX. I can understand why this would be too,
why spend all that energy writing a dozen different versions of the
same thing when you could use it on improving the product (all though
having an FXTree specific (UFO) port would obviouly still be
advantagous as we've seen with RSMB and the ability to tag objects for
blur etc..).
<br>
<br>
Just curious really.
<br>
<br>
DAN
<br>
<br>
<br>
Will Mendez wrote:
<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.h
-digital.com.au/news/newsitemview.asp?id=5">http://www.h-digital.com.au/news
/newsitemview.asp?id=5</a>
<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.digitalvideoediting.com
/articles/viewarticle.jsp?id=31942">http://www.digitalvideoediting.com/articles
/viewarticle.jsp?id=31942</a>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
-- --Original Message-- --
<br>
From: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:owner-xsi@(protected)"
>owner-xsi@(protected)</a> [<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto
:owner-xsi@(protected)">mailto:owner-xsi@(protected)</a>] On
Behalf
<br>
Of Andre DeAngelis
<br>
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2005 9:36 AM
<br>
To: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:XSI@(protected)">XSI
@(protected)</a>
<br>
Subject: RE: NAB 2005 - a bit disappointed
<br>
<br>
<br>
In fact I can't seem to get much information t all about. The only
<br>
announcement seems to be Shake 4 and FCP 5.
<br>
<br>
Pretty disappointed with the reports personally.
<br>
<br>
-- --Original Message-- --
<br>
From: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:owner-xsi@(protected)"
>owner-xsi@(protected)</a> [<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto
:owner-xsi@(protected)">mailto:owner-xsi@(protected)</a>] On
Behalf
<br>
Of Bernard Lebel
<br>
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 7:58 PM
<br>
To: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:XSI@(protected)">XSI
@(protected)</a>
<br>
Subject: Re: NAB 2005 - a bit disappointed
<br>
<br>
I don't recall you being pleased about XSI, Luke.... ;-)
<br>
<br>
As far as I can tell, the big news with XSI have always been at
<br>
Siggraph....
<br>
<br>
Cheers
<br>
Bernard
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
lpiasecki76 wrote:
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">I must admit that I'm a bit disappointed at
the lack of any major news
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">during NAB 2005.
<br>
<br>
There are certain limitations in the software that I was hoping would
<br>
get addressed in a new version, but this was probably the quietest NAB
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">show in the history of XSI.
<br>
<br>
I really hope that the development speed and cycles did not change to
<br>
that of Maya...
<br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
---
<br>
Unsubscribe? Mail <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Majordomo
@(protected)">Majordomo@(protected)</a> with the following text in
<br>
body:
<br>
unsubscribe xsi
<br>
<br>
---
<br>
Unsubscribe? Mail <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Majordomo
@(protected)">Majordomo@(protected)</a> with the following text in
<br>
body:
<br>
unsubscribe xsi
<br>
<br>
---
<br>
Unsubscribe? Mail <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Majordomo
@(protected)">Majordomo@(protected)</a> with the following text in
body:
<br>
unsubscribe xsi
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
---
<br>
Unsubscribe? Mail <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Majordomo
@(protected)">Majordomo@(protected)</a> with the following text in
body:
<br>
unsubscribe xsi
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>
|
|
|