Mailing List
Home
Forum Home
Softimage
Carrara
trueSpace
Dir3d-l
Maya - a powerful 3D animation and visual effects software
Macromedia Flash Development
Subjects
Cameras
scaleDown command
black out solved
Aircraft Tutorial
Mathematical XYZ ?
Its done This vs That
Its done first week
recommendations for screen video captures?
3DExplorer "Oddity "
New Director
ProTeam renewals
Fuel 's new websites (X post)
Blue peter create a make toy
targeting groups question
XPost: Shockwave 3D game ( sort of )
RES: RES: RES: Fish Modeling
Emitting particles from object intersection
Fuel 's new websites (X post)
Texturing
Big Break Contest Videos
New Plugins
Models and Texture on my updated site
Error Installing Patch tS6 6
Plasma?
Looking for Inspiration
Weird EMail Q
It 's done first week ?
Cherry not cranberry
New game
Camera Animation Problem
Particle plugins?
 
IDE

IDE

2005-04-05       - By Martin Matzeder

 Back
Reply:     <<     21     22     23     24     25     26     27     28     29     30     >>  

Thank You,
will have a look at the vc++ express, too.

Martin

Raffaele "ThE_JacO" Fragapane wrote:

>For a single user only intending to do OGL and XSI work (all I do) I could
>never find any appreciable differences between pro (what I have at work) and
>standard.
>
>I believe the differences are mostly in the diagnostic and group tools.
>
>Serious users of these IDEs could probably disagree, I'm not nearly as good
>a programmer as it takes to be concerned with every detail of an IDE, but
>afaic standard edition is perfectly fine, and the compiler is the same
>optimized one of pro judging from the lack of differencies between my
>compiles at work and at home.
>
>Also consider downloading VC++ express 2005 beta to see if you like it.
>It's free, it's stable and glitches free enough to do one-man-band work on
>GLUT, XSI and Maya, and it will give you a chance to evaluate the version
>before shelling out cash for it.
>
>If you like it you can then proceed to buy 2003a or wait for 2005.
>
>~Raffaele Fragapane
>~Lead "I'm sure we can make it work"
>~Peerless Camera Company
>
>
>-- --Original Message-- --
>From: owner-xsi@(protected) [mailto:owner-xsi@(protected)] On Behalf Of
>Martin Matzeder
>Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 11:41 AM
>To: XSI@(protected)
>Subject: Re: IDE
>
>If I only want to do cpp with it, what are the main differences between
>Visual C++ .NET Standard 2003 and  Visual Studio .NET Pro 2003. Theres a
>huge price difference. Is  Visual C++ .NET Standard 2003 suffincient for
>writing and compiling code for xsi.
>For example are there some restrictions like not being able to optimize
>or stuff like that.
>
>Martin
>
>
>Felix Gebhardt wrote:
>
>  
>
>>I'm a big fan of VS.net too. No Intellisense - no fun. You could get
>>the Standard C++ Edition (at Amazon for example) and switch the
>>compiler files with the ones from the free 2003 Toolkit to get an
>>optimizing compiler + a very mature IDE for under 100 bucks. Optimize
>>is is going to be greyed out but you can add all switches in the
>>command line field.
>>
>>F.
>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>---
>Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
>Version: 6.0.799 / Virus Database: 543 - Release Date: 19-Nov-04 (See http://Nov-04.ora-code.com)
>
>
>---
>Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo@(protected) with the following text in body:
>unsubscribe xsi
>
>  
>

---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo@(protected) with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi