 | | | IDE | IDE 2005-04-05 - By Martin Matzeder
Back
If I only want to do cpp with it, what are the main differences between
Visual C++ .NET Standard 2003 and Visual Studio .NET Pro 2003. Theres a
huge price difference. Is Visual C++ .NET Standard 2003 suffincient for
writing and compiling code for xsi.
For example are there some restrictions like not being able to optimize
or stuff like that.
Martin
Felix Gebhardt wrote:
>
> I'm a big fan of VS.net too. No Intellisense - no fun. You could get
> the Standard C++ Edition (at Amazon for example) and switch the
> compiler files with the ones from the free 2003 Toolkit to get an
> optimizing compiler + a very mature IDE for under 100 bucks. Optimize
> is is going to be greyed out but you can add all switches in the
> command line field.
>
> F.
>
>
> Raffaele "ThE_JacO" Fragapane wrote:
>
>> I always thought that IDE stood for integrated dev environment, read
>> editor+basic project/source management+debugging and at least
>> connectivity
>> to a compiler, if not an integrated one.
>>
>> Can't see vim, Gvim, Emacs and the various other editors to be
>> anything more
>> then beefy text editors to be honest.
>>
>> Personally I still have to find something I feel more comfortable in
>> then
>> VS.net 2003a, and 2005 seems very promising (especially with the express
>> editions of various supports).
>>
>> I've been toying with eclipse but not much, from what I've seen it seems
>> nice, but on linux I still use KDE (which I'm not too fond of) just
>> because
>> I know it.
>>
>> ~Raffaele Fragapane
>> ~Lead "I'm sure we can make it work"
>> ~Peerless Camera Company
>>
>>
>>
>>
> ---
> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo@(protected) with the following text in
> body:
> unsubscribe xsi
>
---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo@(protected) with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi
|
|
|