 | | | IDE | IDE 2005-04-04 - By Erik
Back
If you're still looking you should defintely give SlickEdit a try, it's
name may be putting you off sounding like a beefy editor, but it offers
everything an IDE should offer including class hierarchy browsing,
compiler and build environment integration (both gcc as well as others),
degubber integration (gdb and idb amongst others), the lot. I've used
KDevelop a lot but I find it lacking for anything not KDE/Qt related and
rather bloated.
On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 16:50 +0200, Raffaele "ThE_JacO" Fragapane wrote:
> I always thought that IDE stood for integrated dev environment, read
> editor+basic project/source management+debugging and at least connectivity
> to a compiler, if not an integrated one.
>
> Can't see vim, Gvim, Emacs and the various other editors to be anything more
> then beefy text editors to be honest.
>
> Personally I still have to find something I feel more comfortable in then
> VS.net 2003a, and 2005 seems very promising (especially with the express
> editions of various supports).
>
> I've been toying with eclipse but not much, from what I've seen it seems
> nice, but on linux I still use KDE (which I'm not too fond of) just because
> I know it.
>
> ~Raffaele Fragapane
> ~Lead "I'm sure we can make it work"
> ~Peerless Camera Company
>
>
> -- --Original Message-- --
> From: owner-xsi@(protected) [mailto:owner-xsi@(protected)] On Behalf Of
> kim aldis
> Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 5:00 PM
> To: XSI@(protected)
> Subject: RE: IDE
>
> Vim.
>
> > -- --Original Message-- --
> > From: owner-xsi@(protected)
> > [mailto:owner-xsi@(protected)] On Behalf Of Martin Matzeder
> > Sent: 04 April 2005 15:37
> > To: XSI@(protected)
> > Subject: Re: IDE
> >
> > Thank You both,
> >
> > I'm still making up my mind
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > Erik wrote:
> >
> > >Although I've used Eclipse in the past it feels sluggish and
> > overkill
> > >for what you really need, even on a high-end system it's
> > Java roots are
> > >clearly noticeable.
> > >
> > >After quite some testing and switching IDE's my personal favourite
> > >remains Visual SlickEdit with Intel C++. SlickEdit isn't
> > free but it's
> > >worth every penny since you can use the same IDE on all
> > major platforms
> > >including Win32, Linux, BSD, SOlaris, etc and I use the exact same
> > >build configs and workspace configs on both Win as well as
> > Linux. It's
> > >very similar to Visual Studio but I find it a far better general
> > >purpose IDE also supporting syntax recognition for Python, Perl,
> > >JavaScript, etc. In terms of custimisation (which is a BIG
> > bonus if you
> > >do a lot of
> > >development) it's built-in Slick-C C-like macro language is one the
> > >best extension and scripting environments I've come across
> > in any IDE.
> > >
> > >Intel C++ comes in both a commercially supported
> > not-for-free version
> > >and a user community supported free version and it's by far the best
> > >compiler I've come across sofar, beating gcc on ANSI compliance and
> > >performance (and no by small margins) while being largely
> > compatible in
> > >terms of commandline execution and make environment.
> > >
> > >Just my two cents, but if you develop for multiple x86 based
> > platforms
> > >(and in case of SlickEdit as an environment even for non-x86 based
> > >platforms) it's the best I've come across.
> > >
> > >CHeers,
> > >
> > >Erik
> > >
> > >On Sun, 2005-04-03 at 13:05 +0100, Alan Jones wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >>I personally like Eclipse for the IDE. It's win/linux your
> > choice of
> > >>compilers. I just use the GNU compiler on linux and the
> > mingw port of
> > >>the GNU compiler on linux to cross-compile for windows
> > (though so far
> > >>I've not found a way to cross-compile shaders due to some mentalray
> > >>trickiness with the .dlls and reimps inability to convert the
> > >>shader.lib to a shader.a library which doesn't link to a particular
> > >>.dll).
> > >>
> > >>Though if you want to use a MS compiler you can use the
> > free MS Visual
> > >>C++ Toolkit. The eclipse wiki covers how to setup various
> > compilers to
> > >>work with it.
> > >>
> > >>http://www.eclipse.org and http://www.eclipse.org/cdt (for the C/C++
> > >>tools) - there's a link to the wiki from there.
> > >>
> > >>Cheers,
> > >>
> > >>Alan.
> > >>
> > >>On Apr 3, 2005 9:52 AM, Martin Matzeder
> > >><puppet_martin@(protected)> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>Hi,
> > >>>
> > >>>what kind of IDE do You guys use to write and compile Your
> > cpp code
> > >>>for xsi plugins (on windows).
> > >>>Is Visual C++ .NET Standard a good option?
> > >>>
> > >>>Martin
> > >>>---
> > >>>Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo@(protected) with the
> > following text in body:
> > >>>unsubscribe xsi
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>---
> > >>Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo@(protected) with the
> > following text in body:
> > >>unsubscribe xsi
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> > ---
> > Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo@(protected) with the following
> > text in body:
> > unsubscribe xsi
> >
> >
>
> ---
> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo@(protected) with the following text in body:
> unsubscribe xsi
>
> ---
> Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.799 / Virus Database: 543 - Release Date: 19-Nov-04 (See http://Nov-04.ora-code.com)
>
>
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.799 / Virus Database: 543 - Release Date: 19-Nov-04 (See http://Nov-04.ora-code.com)
>
>
> ---
> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo@(protected) with the following text in body:
> unsubscribe xsi
>
--
---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo@(protected) with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi
|
|
|