 | | | IDE | IDE 2005-04-04 - By Alan Jones
Back
Kim solders his own CPUs too ;-)
Seriously though vim is awesome - particularly for messing with .mi
files - not too many text apps that can open a 1.4gig file and then
work with it like its 27k big. I'm just a bit of a girl when it comes
to IDEs.
Cheers,
Alan.
On Apr 4, 2005 3:59 PM, kim aldis <kim@(protected)> wrote:
> Vim.
>
> > -- --Original Message-- --
> > From: owner-xsi@(protected)
> > [mailto:owner-xsi@(protected)] On Behalf Of Martin Matzeder
> > Sent: 04 April 2005 15:37
> > To: XSI@(protected)
> > Subject: Re: IDE
> >
> > Thank You both,
> >
> > I'm still making up my mind
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > Erik wrote:
> >
> > >Although I've used Eclipse in the past it feels sluggish and
> > overkill
> > >for what you really need, even on a high-end system it's
> > Java roots are
> > >clearly noticeable.
> > >
> > >After quite some testing and switching IDE's my personal favourite
> > >remains Visual SlickEdit with Intel C++. SlickEdit isn't
> > free but it's
> > >worth every penny since you can use the same IDE on all
> > major platforms
> > >including Win32, Linux, BSD, SOlaris, etc and I use the exact same
> > >build configs and workspace configs on both Win as well as
> > Linux. It's
> > >very similar to Visual Studio but I find it a far better general
> > >purpose IDE also supporting syntax recognition for Python, Perl,
> > >JavaScript, etc. In terms of custimisation (which is a BIG
> > bonus if you
> > >do a lot of
> > >development) it's built-in Slick-C C-like macro language is one the
> > >best extension and scripting environments I've come across
> > in any IDE.
> > >
> > >Intel C++ comes in both a commercially supported
> > not-for-free version
> > >and a user community supported free version and it's by far the best
> > >compiler I've come across sofar, beating gcc on ANSI compliance and
> > >performance (and no by small margins) while being largely
> > compatible in
> > >terms of commandline execution and make environment.
> > >
> > >Just my two cents, but if you develop for multiple x86 based
> > platforms
> > >(and in case of SlickEdit as an environment even for non-x86 based
> > >platforms) it's the best I've come across.
> > >
> > >CHeers,
> > >
> > >Erik
> > >
> > >On Sun, 2005-04-03 at 13:05 +0100, Alan Jones wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >>I personally like Eclipse for the IDE. It's win/linux your
> > choice of
> > >>compilers. I just use the GNU compiler on linux and the
> > mingw port of
> > >>the GNU compiler on linux to cross-compile for windows
> > (though so far
> > >>I've not found a way to cross-compile shaders due to some mentalray
> > >>trickiness with the .dlls and reimps inability to convert the
> > >>shader.lib to a shader.a library which doesn't link to a particular
> > >>.dll).
> > >>
> > >>Though if you want to use a MS compiler you can use the
> > free MS Visual
> > >>C++ Toolkit. The eclipse wiki covers how to setup various
> > compilers to
> > >>work with it.
> > >>
> > >>http://www.eclipse.org and http://www.eclipse.org/cdt (for the C/C++
> > >>tools) - there's a link to the wiki from there.
> > >>
> > >>Cheers,
> > >>
> > >>Alan.
> > >>
> > >>On Apr 3, 2005 9:52 AM, Martin Matzeder
> > >><puppet_martin@(protected)> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>Hi,
> > >>>
> > >>>what kind of IDE do You guys use to write and compile Your
> > cpp code
> > >>>for xsi plugins (on windows).
> > >>>Is Visual C++ .NET Standard a good option?
> > >>>
> > >>>Martin
> > >>>---
> > >>>Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo@(protected) with the
> > following text in body:
> > >>>unsubscribe xsi
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>---
> > >>Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo@(protected) with the
> > following text in body:
> > >>unsubscribe xsi
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> > ---
> > Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo@(protected) with the following
> > text in body:
> > unsubscribe xsi
> >
> >
>
> ---
> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo@(protected) with the following text in body:
> unsubscribe xsi
>
---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo@(protected) with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi
|
|
|