Mailing List
Home
Forum Home
Softimage
Carrara
trueSpace
Dir3d-l
Maya - a powerful 3D animation and visual effects software
Macromedia Flash Development
Subjects
Cameras
scaleDown command
black out solved
Aircraft Tutorial
Mathematical XYZ ?
Its done This vs That
Its done first week
recommendations for screen video captures?
3DExplorer "Oddity "
New Director
ProTeam renewals
Fuel 's new websites (X post)
Blue peter create a make toy
targeting groups question
XPost: Shockwave 3D game ( sort of )
RES: RES: RES: Fish Modeling
Emitting particles from object intersection
Fuel 's new websites (X post)
Texturing
Big Break Contest Videos
New Plugins
Models and Texture on my updated site
Error Installing Patch tS6 6
Plasma?
Looking for Inspiration
Weird EMail Q
It 's done first week ?
Cherry not cranberry
New game
Camera Animation Problem
Particle plugins?
 
AA and motion blurring a depth pass or not (was RE: DOF and Depth Pass probl

AA and motion blurring a depth pass or not (was RE: DOF and Depth Pass probl

2005-03-22       - By Morten Bartholdy

 Back
Reply:     1     2     3     4     5     6     7     8     9     10  

True Raffaele - and for transparent obejcts this is true also. Still with FG
and BG split into separate passes there seems to be no cheap solution to
adding DOF to motionblurred material that I've heard of, except for those
situations where depth in a given pass can be ignored and a fixed out of
focus filter can be applied to the separate passes. Any suggestions?

--

Morten Bartholdy | morten@(protected)
Denmark


-- -- Original Message -- --
From: "Raffaele "ThE_JacO" Fragapane" <jaco@(protected)>
To: <XSI@(protected)>
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 2:23 PM
Subject: RE: AA and motion blurring a depth pass or not (was RE: DOF and
Depth Pass problem)


> The one thing I think is missing is the context.
>
> when would you have a situation where you need a unified depth pass for a
> quickly moving motion blurred foreground AND a moving motion blurred
> background?
>
> In those cases you usually isolate the depth passes for the foreground and
> background elements to have more range and control on individual items,
and
> in that case the artifacts of BG VS FG will not matter since what you are
> doing happens in the object/bundle of objects in the respective layers.
>
> There sure are situations where these issues may arise, but they seem to
be
> mostly exceptions since most times you have a hero in foreground on a shot
> plate and only additional props or photogrammetry on the back place.
>
> If we consider a single beauty for all the elements, or fully CGmovies
> rendered in one huge go, I'll agree; but how common  a situation is that?
> Passes should be sensibly used to split FG and BG layers as well, and in
> that case you want individual depth passes.
>
> ~Raffaele Fragapane
> ~Lead "I'm sure we can make it work"
> ~Peerless Camera Company
>
>
> -- --Original Message-- --
> From: owner-xsi@(protected) [mailto:owner-xsi@(protected)] On Behalf
Of
> Morten Bartholdy
> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 2:21 PM
> To: XSI@(protected)
> Subject: Re: AA and motion blurring a depth pass or not (was RE: DOF and
> Depth Pass problem)
>
> Given that AA should be avoided as it introduces depth errors the same
goes
> for any other edgeblurring proces - mb included.
>
> I suppose the only solution to having motion blur AND DOF is the expensive
> way. I'd like to be proven wrong though...
>
> --
>
> Morten Bartholdy | morten@(protected)
> Denmark
>
>
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.799 / Virus Database: 543 - Release Date: 19-Nov-04 (See http://Nov-04.ora-code.com)
>
>
> ---
> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo@(protected) with the following text in body:
> unsubscribe xsi
>
>

---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo@(protected) with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi