Its done first week 2004-01-29 - By Kris
Back
At 05:28 PM 28-01-2004, Bobby Ray wrote:
>I said it at the beginning that I meant no offense and I still say it
>now No Offense. Let not take a statement so serious. The Facts are the
>Facts Maya Softimage is HighEnd tS is not this is only argued when
>someone disagree with that. tS probably can do movie and TV's that not
>what being said HiEnd Renderers produce HiEnd Work.
It's not offensive, it's just an old, I guess argument isn't the right
word, it's just that some of the back-and-forths on this topic in the past
have gone on an on, and with extreme rancor, beating the proverbial dead
horse until it's just annunrecognizable smush. So I admit that i, for one,
tend tor eact badly when it loos like that poor dead horse might be
resurrected again.
I personally do think, though, that it'd be interesting and useful to see
some solid comparisons between other programs and tS. If nothing else, it
would establish some known paramaters/limitations for people to evaluate
and work with. I do also think that, if Caligari could manage a
subdivision structure, i.e. with something like trueModeler (or whatever
one would call the older, student-priced versions), trueSpace (current
trueSpace, with continuing development) and a "super-duper" version geared
towards the film and other intensive-use industries (trueVision, truePower,
whatever), they'd be in a unique position.
As I see it, what people fear, with all the talk of going high-end, is the
possibility of affordable trueSpace versions disappearing in favor of
$30,000 program-plus-plugins setups.
- Kris
- Kris M. Krieger
http://www.pterochromics.com
|
|
