 | | | proportional modeling wackyness | proportional modeling wackyness 2005-03-05 - By Gene Crucean
Back
Thanks Brent.
I was a little confused because I thought the consider neighborhood
option was to enable some sort of edge constraint. Thanks again
though.
On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 13:53:48 -0500, Brent McPherson
<brentmc@(protected)> wrote:
> Gene,
>
> The right way to address this is to add an edge distance option to the
> proportional PPG.
>
> I'll make sure this gets added to our database as a feature request.
>
> Thanks.
> --
> Brent
>
> -- --Original Message-- --
> From: Gene Crucean [mailto:genecrucean@(protected)]
> Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 6:15 PM
> To: XSI@(protected)
> Subject: Re: proportional modeling wackyness
>
> Hopefully one of the soft guys will see this :)
>
> xsi
> http://www.visualboo.com/misc/propWackyness.html
>
> max
> http://www.visualboo.com/misc/propNiceness.html
>
> Btw, whats the official way to submit feature requests to soft? I
> thought I remembered having a link to a form on their site but I can't
> remember now.
>
> Thanks guys
>
> On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 16:40:59 +0100, Raffaele ThE_JacO Fragapane
> <jaco@(protected)> wrote:
> > I believe It's based on direct distance in space.
> > Check neighborhood ensures that only points somehow connected AND
> > falling in that distance will be include, however, if the falloff
> > makes proportional reach the base of the fingers (in your case) the
> > points of the nearby finger will be considered connected.
> >
> > A quick workaround (I use it when dealing with fingers, paws,
> > tentacles, pseudopods etc.) is to disconnect the other fingers with
> > disconnect components, work on one finger, then use edge connect to
> > reconnect the other fingers.
> >
> > Unless you need those moves in the stack (usually you don't if you're
> > just
> > modeling) it works well.
> >
> > ~Raffaele Fragapane
> > ~Lead "I'm sure we can make it work"
> > ~Peerless Camera Company
> >
> >
> > -- --Original Message-- --
> > From: owner-xsi@(protected) [mailto:owner-xsi@(protected)] On
> > Behalf Of Gene Crucean
> > Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 5:10 PM
> > To: XSI@(protected)
> > Subject: proportional modeling wackyness
> >
> > Anyone know how xsi handles prop modeling? I mean, is it using volume
> > or maybe edge distance?
> >
> > If you tag some verts on a finger for example and increase the falloff
>
> > for proportional (consider neighborhood checked), once it hits the
> > base (knuckle area) it jumps across to the neighboring finger like
> > it's based on volume.
> >
> > Workarounds? Info? Ideas?
> >
> > -gc
> > ---
> > Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo@(protected) with the following text in
> body:
> > unsubscribe xsi
> >
> > ---
> > Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
> > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> > Version: 6.0.799 / Virus Database: 543 - Release Date: 19-Nov-04 (See http://Nov-04.ora-code.com)
> >
> > ---
> > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> > Version: 6.0.799 / Virus Database: 543 - Release Date: 19-Nov-04 (See http://Nov-04.ora-code.com)
> >
> > ---
> > Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo@(protected) with the following text in
> body:
> > unsubscribe xsi
> >
> ---
> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo@(protected) with the following text in
> body:
> unsubscribe xsi
>
> ---
> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo@(protected) with the following text in body:
> unsubscribe xsi
>
---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo@(protected) with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi
|
|
|