proportional modeling wackyness 2005-03-04 - By Raffaele "ThE_JacO" Fragapane
Back
I believe It's based on direct distance in space.
Check neighborhood ensures that only points somehow connected AND falling in
that distance will be include, however, if the falloff makes proportional
reach the base of the fingers (in your case) the points of the nearby finger
will be considered connected.
A quick workaround (I use it when dealing with fingers, paws, tentacles,
pseudopods etc.) is to disconnect the other fingers with disconnect
components, work on one finger, then use edge connect to reconnect the other
fingers.
Unless you need those moves in the stack (usually you don't if you're just
modeling) it works well.
~Raffaele Fragapane
~Lead "I'm sure we can make it work"
~Peerless Camera Company
-- --Original Message-- --
From: owner-xsi@(protected) [mailto:owner-xsi@(protected)] On Behalf Of
Gene Crucean
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 5:10 PM
To: XSI@(protected)
Subject: proportional modeling wackyness
Anyone know how xsi handles prop modeling? I mean, is it using volume
or maybe edge distance?
If you tag some verts on a finger for example and increase the falloff
for proportional (consider neighborhood checked), once it hits the
base (knuckle area) it jumps across to the neighboring finger like
it's based on volume.
Workarounds? Info? Ideas?
-gc
---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo@(protected) with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi
---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.799 / Virus Database: 543 - Release Date: 19-Nov-04 (See http://Nov-04.ora-code.com)
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.799 / Virus Database: 543 - Release Date: 19-Nov-04 (See http://Nov-04.ora-code.com)
---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo@(protected) with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi
|
|
