 | | | feature request: Disconnect hairs from follicles | feature request: Disconnect hairs from follicles 2004-06-25 - By Raffaele "ThE_JacO" Fragapane
Back
Here I was actually hearing complaints that they finally introduced the full
range of deformers but that instancing wouldn't align by the deformation
(and instancing really is the case when you need that the most).
So what's the deal? People here missing something obvious?
P.S.
Obviously I still think that needs to be fixed anyway, together with another
400 things about particles, 800 if you read Kim's list.
~Raffaele Fragapane
~Freelance Technical Animator & TD
~Senior TA @ Peerless Camera
-- --Original Message-- --
From: owner-xsi@(protected) [mailto:owner-xsi@(protected)] On Behalf Of
Dan Yargici
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2004 10:00 AM
To: XSI@(protected)
Subject: Re: feature request: Disconnect hairs from follicles
> Also notable was the falloff for particle deformations and the fact that
> the particle vectors align to the deformed path.
Yes, this *has* to be fixed....
DAN
---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo@(protected) with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi
---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.638 / Virus Database: 409 - Release Date: 21-Mar-04 (See http://Mar-04.ora-code.com)
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.638 / Virus Database: 409 - Release Date: 21-Mar-04 (See http://Mar-04.ora-code.com)
---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo@(protected) with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi
|
|
|